Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Anthropol Med ; 28(4): 576-591, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2272079

ABSTRACT

Understanding people's concepts of illness and health is key to crafting policies and communications campaigns to address a particular medical concern. This paper gathers cultural knowledge on infectious disease causation, prevention, and treatment the Philippines that are particularly relevant for the COVID-19 pandemic, and analyzes their implications for public health. This paper draws from ethnographic work (e.g. participant observation, interviews, conversations, virtual ethnography) carried out individually by each of the two authors from February to September 2020. The data was analyzed in relation to the anthropological literature on local health knowledge in the Philippines. We find that notions of hawa (contagion) and resistensiya (immunity) inform people's views of illness causation as well as their preventive practices - including the use of face masks and 'vitamins' and other pharmaceuticals, as well as the ways in which they negotiate prescriptions of face mask use and physical distancing. These perceptions and practices go beyond biomedical knowledge and are continuously being shaped by people's everyday experiences and circulations of knowledge in traditional and social media. Our study reveals that people's novel practices reflect recurrent, familiar, and long-held concepts - such as the moral undertones of hawa and experimentation inherent in resistensiya. Policies and communications efforts should acknowledge and anticipate how these notions may serve as either barriers or facilitators to participatory care and improved health outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Anthropology, Medical , Humans , Philippines , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Health Place ; 79: 102929, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2242501

ABSTRACT

This article argues that local constructions of risky and safe spaces, as articulated by the notions 'loob' (inside) and 'labas' (outside), informed popular and political responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines, leading to an overemphasis on staying at home and, conversely, a general avoidance or fear of outdoor spaces that was at times reinforced by public health authorities. Practices and policies related to the pandemic response rendered this binary opposition between 'loob' and 'labas' visible, from regulations concerning the use of personal protective equipment to restrictions of access to outdoor spaces. While this emergent form of bodily proxemics was contested and negotiated over time, its tenacity throughout the pandemic underscores the importance of understanding how people spatialize risk in times of health crises.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Philippines/epidemiology , Fear , Public Health
3.
Health Hum Rights ; 24(1): 121-123, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1958126
4.
Med Anthropol ; 41(5): 518-531, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1908439

ABSTRACT

Drawing on face-to-face and virtual fieldwork in the Philippines, I document the emergence of antibody testing as a popular practice among Filipinos during the COVID-19 pandemic, helping them make decisions about vaccines and other life choices. Antibodies gave people a sense of agency and control amid a health crisis for which political and medical authorities failed to offer certainty and hope, particularly at a time of vaccine scarcity and viral surges. However, by diverting attention from the health care system to individual immune systems, antibodies also reinforced the individual "responsibilization" that has characterized the Philippine government's pandemic response.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Anthropology, Medical , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Pandemics , Philippines
5.
Health & Human Rights: An International Journal ; 24(1):121-123, 2022.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-1897951

ABSTRACT

The authors offer insight on the struggle of health workers engaged on the political frontlines. They cite threats of violence facing health workers around the world for criticizing governments' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and for raising COVID-19 related concerns. Emphasis is given on the need for transparency and mechanisms for political participation, as well as the protection of global health in an atmosphere of freedom of expression and protection of civil and political rights.

8.
Soc Sci Med ; 292: 114567, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1510309

ABSTRACT

As part of their populist performances during disease outbreaks, public officials and politicians tend to offer 'miracle cures' or 'wonder drugs' that can supposedly treat or prevent the disease in question. This article analyzes contemporary instances of what we call 'pharmaceutical messianism' and proposes four characteristics for this phenomenon, namely, that it: (1) emerges during times of extraordinary health crisis; (2) builds on pre-existing knowledge, practices, and sentiments; (3) borrows from medical, often heterodox, authority; and (4) involves accessible, affordable, and/or familiar substances. Demonstrating the analytic value of our framework, we present three case studies, constructed using academic and journalistic sources, during the COVID-19 pandemic: hydroxychloroquine in France, ivermectin in the Philippines, and Covid-Organics in Madagascar. We conclude by identifying some implications of our findings on public health and avenues for future research.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Vaccine ; 39(35): 4964-4972, 2021 08 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1331282

ABSTRACT

This article applies a qualitative approach to the 2017 dengue vaccine controversy involving Sanofi Pasteur's Dengvaxia to understand vaccine hesitancy and related anxieties in contemporary Philippines. Through a multisited project that investigated the health aspirations and lived experiences of low- and middle-income Filipinos across urban and rural Philippines, this article distills the perspectives of both ordinary community members and health workers in local and national capacities regarding the controversy-and how it altered their perceptions toward vaccines, health care, and government. Our study reveals widespread mistrust and fear in the communities toward both the state and health institutions following the controversy, with frontline health workers bearing the brunt of the communities' apprehensions, and the media partly responsible in fomenting these fears. Given the repetitive nature of health and vaccine controversies, this article suggests the importance of responsible journalism, well-calibrated crisis communications, and a people-centered health paradigm that involves exploring local contexts of vaccine hesitancy and mining people's lived experiences in tackling present and future health crises-especially now in the advent of COVID-19 vaccinations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dengue Vaccines , Vaccines , Fear , Humans , Philippines , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
11.
Trop Med Int Health ; 26(1): 20-22, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-799706

ABSTRACT

Community health workers in low- and middle-income country primary health care systems are well suited to perform essential functions on the frontlines of Covid-19 pandemic responses. However, clear and coordinated guidance, updated infection control training, and reliable access to personal protective equipment must be ensured in order to deploy them safely and effectively. With these additional responsibilities, community health workers must also be supported to ensure that hard-fought gains in population health, including progress on non-communicable diseases, are sustained throughout the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Developing Countries , Population Health , Community Health Workers/economics , Humans , Investments , Primary Health Care/organization & administration
12.
Glob Public Health ; 15(10): 1417-1429, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-705971

ABSTRACT

This paper uses the vocabulary of 'medical populism' to identify and analyse the political constructions of (and responses to) the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil, the Philippines, and the United States from January to mid-July 2020, particularly by the countries' heads of state: Jair Bolsonaro, Rodrigo Duterte, and Donald Trump. In all three countries, the leaders' responses to the outbreak can be characterised by the following features: simplifying the pandemic by downplaying its impacts or touting easy solutions or treatments, spectacularizing their responses to crisis, forging divisions between the 'people' and dangerous 'others', and making medical knowledge claims to support the above. Taken together, the case studies illuminate the role of individual political actors in defining public health crises, suggesting that medical populism is not an exceptional, but a familiar response to them. This paper concludes by offering recommendations for global health in anticipating and responding to pandemics and infectious disease outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Policy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Politics , Public Health , Betacoronavirus , Brazil , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Philippines , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL